Loading
Loading
PRIME doesn't ask a business to change how it talks about its own work. It maps what's already there into a single governed model, then tells leadership what it means.
The same commitment looks different depending on which vertical is running it: a Job, a Statement of Work, an Opportunity. PRIME maps each one into a single governed model without asking anyone to relabel their own systems.
| Construction | Consulting | Software | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What you run | Procore or Autodesk Build, plus Sage 300 CRE, Viewpoint Vista, or Foundation | Kantata, Certinia, Deltek, or Unanet, plus NetSuite or Sage Intacct | Salesforce and Jira, plus NetSuite |
| What you call it | Jobs, change orders, pay applications | Projects, SOWs, engagements | Opportunities, epics, implementations |
| What you get back | Committed cost against billed and earned revenue | Committed delivery against available capacity | Booked revenue against implementation capacity |
A deal sits in Proposal because someone sent a proposal. Nobody has met the person who signs. Your CRM reports the stage. It cannot report the gap.
A project advances to execution because the date arrived. Resourcing was never confirmed.
Revenue gets recognized against a job whose delivery health is falling.
Same failure, three departments. PRIME scores the work, not the stage, and shows you the distance between them.
Built on operationalized signals, not rep confidence.
What has been committed against what can actually be delivered.
Where to grow, where to hold, where the current team is under-used.
Where the constraint actually sits, continuously rather than quarterly.
Engagement signal tied to revenue outcome rather than tracked separately.
Whether the operating model, strategic initiatives, and organizational performance actually support the commitments being made. This is what makes growth defensible to a board or a lender, not just visible on a dashboard.
Connecting projected revenue to margin, cash, terms, recognition, and financial exposure, treating the top line with the same rigor already applied to capital allocation.
Connecting sales motion to strategy, tying pipeline activity back to revenue sustainability, capacity, and the business objectives it's supposed to serve, rather than treating sales activity as its own self-contained scoreboard.
Utilization and workforce efficacy across the commercial engine, not just capacity on paper. This is the operational layer that has to enforce governance consistently across every deal and every tool touching the pipeline.
Utilization, capacity planning, and project optimization, with customer engagement kept healthy: the levers that actually protect the margin leadership assumed was locked in at signing.
Bring one forecast, commitment, or operating challenge, and we'll show you the evidence behind it.
Book an Executive Briefing →